|
Written by Philippe Rivi?re
|
|
Saturday, 31 May 2008 |
|
South Africa will host the World Cup in 2010 so construction ? and corruption ? is booming. But almost none of the building or the money can be accessed by the poor who live in shantytowns without proper water, sanitation or electricity. These inequalities could be a major issue in the 2009 presidential election.
?All people shall have the right to live where they choose,
be decently housed, and to bring up their families
in comfort and security.?
(Article 9 of the Freedom Charter adopted
by the Congress of the People at Kliptown
on 26 June 1955.)
There?s a house for sale for $125 just two kilometres from the beach at False Bay, in Khayelitsha, a township east of Cape Town, between Table Mountain and the Cape of Good Hope. The downside is that it is in the QQ section, an informal settlement on marshy land beneath the high-tension cables of Eskom, South Africa?s public electricity utility. Despite a ban, the area is covered with wooden shacks with corrugated iron roofs, the homes of hundreds of thousands of urban poor.
More than 20 years after QQ was squatted, its 600 families still have no sanitation and rely on eight taps for drinking water. An anarchic tangle of electricity cables, hidden beneath tarmac, connects the shantytown to metered supplies in the adjoining legal settlement. Fatal fires are frequent. Anything that can be let out is for hire, even a key to the latrines. Not far from Mzonke Poni?s home, a branch from the main supply cable is concealed in a corner, behind a pile of boxes: he has lived in QQ with his mother for more than six years and hopes to avoid being cut off during the next police raid.
?We?ve got our own Waterfront,? says Poni. QQ has appropriated the name of Cape Town?s smart district because, for four months of the year, winter rains flood all the shacks on low ground. Some residents have raised the soil by a few centimetres to buy themselves enough time to move chairs, television and personal effects to the home of a neighbour or family member.
QQ is in Western Cape province, where half-a-million people are waiting for homes. Wave after wave of young workers flood into the shantytowns, most of them from the rural districts of Eastern Cape. To stay, they need the approval of the local residents?committee, which gives priority to couples with young children. Although, or maybe because, life is so precarious, there is a strong sense of community in these areas (1). So it came as a shock when the authorities decided to clear them out, district by district, without any preliminary consultation.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Nigeria hands big tax bill to Shell and Exxon |
|
Written by Matthew Green
|
|
Tuesday, 27 May 2008 |
|
Nigeria is demanding Shell and ExxonMobil pay a combined total of
almost $2bn in unpaid taxes and revenues after a review of contracts
covering giant offshore oilfields signed in the early 1990s.
The
demand has underlined the government's desire to drive a harder bargain
with western majors in spite of deals struck in the past week to tackle
funding shortfalls damaging its joint ventures with ExxonMobil and
Total.
Emmanuel Egbogah, the chairman of the committee that
examined the contracts, told the Financial Times he would contact the
oil companies soon to begin recovering the funds.
"I am extremely
confident that we will get the money that we say is owed to us, because
this is based on the facts of the agreement," Mr Egbogah said.
The
committee concluded that Shell and ExxonMobil owe the government a
total of $1.9bn (?1.2bn, ?975m) after reviewing the way tax breaks were
implemented under the agreements, and the pricing system for gas sold
by Shell.
Shell said the matter was under discussion. "Shell Nigeria
Exploration and Production Company Ltd conducts its business in
compliance with all laws and regulations," the company said. ExxonMobil
was not available for comment. Analystssaid both companies were likely
to contest the findings.
The review of the contracts forms part
of a overhaul of the energy sector launched last year by Umaru
Yar'Adua, Nigeria's president, aimed at maximising revenues from
Africa's biggest oil industry.
But industry executives say
Nigeria's increasingly assertive demands are among the factors slowing
growth in the deepwater arena, seen by western majors as one of the
world's most geologically promising but under-explored oil and gas
frontiers. Angola, by contrast, has enjoyed much faster offshore
expansion, pumping more oil than Nigeria for the first time last month
after a strike and militant attacks hit output at its larger rival.
Nigeria
aims to boost production partly by tackling funding shortfalls in its
five joint ventures with western majors in the creeks of the Niger
delta, where the government's failure to pay its share of costs has
stalled key projects.
The state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum
Corp said it had agreed to borrow $2bn from ExxonMobil and $1bn from
Total in the past week to kick-start development. Shell said it was
close to striking a similar kind of agreement.
The tax and
revenue claims stem from contracts signed in 1993 covering Shell's
giant Bonga field and ExxonMobil's Erha development, which heralded the
start of a new era of deepwater production in Nigeria. The investments
have proved some of the most lucrative for oil majors, but the
government feels short-changed.
The review committee has
calculated it is owed $850m from Bonga and $646.3m from Erha due to the
incorrect application of tax breaks. The government wants a further
$414.6m in revenues it says Shell owes from sales of Bonga's gas. Bonga
supplies Nigeria's sole plant for exporting liquefied natural gas.
|
|
|
Thousands march against South Africa violence |
|
Written by Marius Bosch
|
|
Saturday, 24 May 2008 |
 JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - Thousands of people marched through South Africa's biggest city on Saturday, calling for an end to the violence that has killed at least 50 African migrants and forced tens of thousands to flee their homes.
Demonstrators carrying placards saying "Xenophobia hurts like apartheid" and "We stand against xenophobia" brought traffic to a standstill in Johannesburg's city centre.
People in the Hillbrow district, home to many African immigrants,
cheered the march, which was organised by churches and labour unions.
Police said townships around Johannesburg were quiet but shops were looted and burnt outside Cape Town late on Friday.
The South African government has been criticised for its slow
reaction to the violence, the worst since apartheid ended 14 years ago,
and for not addressing the poverty that is widely blamed for the
bloodshed.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
It's the economy, stupid... |
|
Written by Susan Mwangi
|
|
Friday, 23 May 2008 |
|
(Johannesburg) - Looking at the current state of the South African state, there is nothing hollow about applying the well-worn cliche, "desperate times have called for desperate measures".
No doubt, the dire economic times have played their role in making intolerable the life of the unemployed man-on-the-street. Some citizens, in utter desperation, have been overcome by a sense of hopelessness. Is it possible that this, compounded by a sense of claustrophobia, (feeling that foreign nationals were taking up the resources and spaces that would otherwise belong to the citizens) could have pushed the indigenous South African to the edge?
The result? Wanton destruction of property and disregard for "Foreign lives". The violence that has been unleashed against foreigners has been the fodder for both the local and international media over the last fortnight or so, as a few citizens have been sending ?bloody? messages (no pun intended) to anyone who cares to listen.
I stand corrected: Are these not the same kind of scenarios (albeit under a short leash), playing themselves out in the U.K (against Eastern Europeans) and other places?
Only a few short months ago I witnessed first-hand a similar out-pouring of hate in Kenya. This brand of xenophobia was labelled ?ethnic cleansing? ? and was aimed at ?foreigners? (never mind that these guys are Kenyans who migrated from a different part of the same country). This massacre left nearly 1.000 dead and hundreds of thousands internally displaced.
Surely, it would be the height of folly to extinguish the lives of African after African and not at least learn a thing about our frail human nature. We need protection from ourselves?
As the world looks in sheer disbelief, I have to as, what ails us as Africans? Poor leadership? Is it afterall ?the economy, stupid!?
Sad but true? this is way too much d?j? vu for one African woman!
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
African Governments Begin Repatriating Nationals |
|
Written by UN Integrated Regional Information Networks
|
|
Friday, 23 May 2008 |
|
(Johannesburg) - The governments of Mozambique and Zimbabwe have begun the "voluntary repatriation" of their citizens, in the wake of ongoing xenophobic violence in South Africa that police say has claimed 42 lives, displaced more than 16,000 people and led to 400 arrests.
The violence, which has seen some foreign nationals necklaced - a throwback to a horrific practice used during the apartheid era, when suspected police informants were killed by placing a burning tyre around their necks - has spread throughout Gauteng and into other provinces since it first broke out in the Johannesburg township of Alexandra 12 days ago.
Johannesburg's mayor, Amos Masondo, has invited all foreign diplomatic missions to a meeting on 23 May, "to discuss xenophobic attitudes in Johannesburg", a spokesperson for the Mozambican consulate told IRIN.
"Plus or minus 10 buses left yesterday [21 May] and there are about 10 buses leaving today for Mozambique. We are doing our best to take our people home," the spokesperson said. About 1,200 people have been repatriated by the Mozambique government and many other Mozambique nationals were making their own way home.
Click Below to Read On...
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 31 - 36 of 95 |